Sentence examples for rating of statements from inspiring English sources

In interpreting these results it should be kept in mind that the concept mapping methodology uses the rating of statements and clusters mainly as a way to support participants in structuring their ideas, and not for making statistical inferences.

Paradoxically, the mean rates of statement 1 and statement 2 of the former group are greater than the rates of the latter group by 9.2%% and 22.6 %, respectively.

The descriptive statistics such as cross tabs and percentages were analyzed to find out the average rating of different statements of the respondents.

The panel reached consensus on the rating of all statements.

The panel reached consensus on the rating of all statements after the third round.

It also presents the average importance rating (on a 1 5 scale) for each of the ideas and the average importance rating of the statements within each cluster.

Standard procedures from previous studies (Barrowclough & Hooley, 2003) were then adopted to calculate the reliability of extraction and rating of attributional statements.

Only information based on patient experiences as retrieved by the individual rating of validated statements were included in the scores used as outcome variable (see Additional files 1, 2 and 3).

This resulted in a rated list of statements for HRM and LMs.

This resulted in a rated list of statements for all participants and for the subgroups of African and Asian researchers.

More specifically, the rating of a statement tended to rise when it was referred to a more "prestigious" author.