Factors contributing to the dropout rate may include a lack of encouragement, difficulty identifying positive role models, and the belief of some women that family and motherhood are incompatible with the scientific lifestyle.
Other possible explanations for the improved survival rate may include better supportive care, differences in the pathogenesis of bioterrorism-related anthrax, differences in susceptibility of the hosts, or a combination of the above [13].
However, the wording of the question was ambiguous and thus some FASD rates may include FAS while others do not.
Other factors behind the reduced transplant rate may include lower socioeconomic status, language and cultural barriers including mistrust, discrimination, and belief in traditional healing methods [ 4].
Additional facilitators for achieving high retention rates may include recruiting patients via media advertising or different health related registers, businesses or insurance companies.
Reasons for such high rates may include errors in prescribing and/or monitoring, or poor compliance, underscoring the importance of developing strategies to improve the quality and safety of prescribing.
Mechanisms responsible for this increase in rate may include greater anxieties of those parents, and healthcare professionals, caring for young children due to their ability to quickly metabolically decompensate.
6 9 The reasons for these low rates may include the migration of MSM. 8 Moreover, studies conducted among urban MSM also revealed a high proportion of migrants among MSM in major cities such as Beijing (88%), 10 Chongqing (80.3%) 11 and Shanghai (79.7%).
Possible reasons for this low rate may include the following: Usually, a new blood sample was needed for a PERT assay at the SNCR, which required the patient returning to the physician who received the information that a PERT assay was considered necessary.
Future research using this validated adverse effect rating system may include longitudinal evaluation of immunosuppressive adverse effects during the acute and chronic post-transplant periods and relationships to medication adherence, physician evaluation and allograft outcomes.
