Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(22)
Power analysis done a priori?; ratings: no = 0, unable to determine = 0, yes = 1; rating item 5: no = 0, partially = 1, yes = 2.
Missing values in student questionnaires ranged between.1 and 2.2% per rating item, with Little's Chi square test indicating that they were missing completely at random (χ2 = 1197.683; df = 1181; p = .361).361
Reviewers also expressed difficulty rating Item 2, regarding the representativeness of the raters.
Scores across the six domains and general rating item were highly variable (range 29 73%).
Average scores of greater than 50% were obtained in four of six domains plus the general rating item.
Average scores of greater than 50% were obtained for two of six domains, plus the general rating item.
Similar(38)
T10 used all four levels in rating, rating items at B1+, B2, C1 levels more than at B1 level.
The average scores for these time periods for each of the 10 rating items are displayed in Table 2.
The rating items are listed in Table 1.
Among the 17 items (14 rating items and 3 additional items), the 14 rating items were introduced into the initial CFA model.
The instrument has 15 items, with 12 rating items and 3 additional items.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com