Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This study was designed to determine (1) the elapsed time between observing operative performances and completing performance ratings under field conditions and (2) the effect of increased elapsed time on rating clarity and detail.
Similar(59)
In the pre-study patient survey (response rate 31%) patients rated clarity for title 9.6 ± 0.9, instruction 9.3 ± 1.4 and questions 9.6 ± 0.7, and comprehensiveness for title 9.6 ± 0.7, instruction 9.3 ± 1.4 and questions 9.8 ± 0.4.
Patients were asked to fill in the questionnaire and rate clarity and comprehensiveness of the title, questionnaire instruction, and questions on two eleven-point visual analogue scales (VAS), ranging from zero to ten (where ten indicated the highest level).
The overall rating of clarity by the patients of the HCPs' communication about trials was high.
We examined differences in rating of clarity for each statement by sex and age groups.
There were no significant differences between the sexes in the rating of clarity for each statement or differences between age groups.
The version with the explicit discussion of the option of no screening ("with" version) was rated subjectively as less strongly in favor of CRC screening, but had lower subjective rating of clarity and a lower overall rating.
Each respondent was asked to complete the form, rating the clarity and relevance of a particular terminal objective for the specified target audience from one (strongly agree) to five (strongly disagree).
Peter Stringer, who spent years listening to Paul O'Connell in Munster and Ireland dressing rooms, rates the clarity of Hooper's team talks particularly highly.
Each domain was rated on clarity, usability, and feasibility using a Likert scale, which ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).
We propose a visual scoring system that rates HIA clarity from 1 (imperceptible) to 4 (excellent) and report the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of this system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com