Suggestions(2)
Exact(8)
All test persons (aged 20 42 years) considered themselves rather or very sensitive towards noise.
Among persons reporting themselves to be "rather" or "very" annoyed by low-frequency noise due to the heat pump/ventilation installations, a higher extent of psycho-social symptoms, sleep disturbance and headaches was found.
To ensure an acceptable environmental quality where less than 5% of the exposed population is rather or very annoyed by railway noise, these noise levels must be below 80 dBLAmaxand below 55Leqrespectively in areas without vibration.
To ensure an acceptable environmental quality where less than 5% of the exposed population is rather or very annoyed by railway noise, these noise levels must be below 80LAmaxand below 55LAeqin areas without vibration.
In the blind sub-trial, the proportion of women who said "rather or very much" was somewhat higher in the placebo group than the HT-group.
This positive picture is also supported by the finding that three out of four participants were rather or very satisfied with the quality of care.
Similar(52)
Is it very good, rather good, neither good nor bad, rather poor or very poor?' Health status was thus registered as an integer from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good), and at 6-month follow-up, intervention patients had better self-reported health than control patients as measured by this question (mean±SD: 3.14±0.87 vs 2.77±0.94, p=0.020).
The questionnaire was rated as easy or rather easy by 97.8% (87/89) of participants, and rather difficult or very difficult by 2.2% (2/89).
86% of the firm representatives said that it was "rather important" or "very important".
I also ran a robustness test with a recoded moderator variable indicating whether firm representatives regard CVT as a "rather important" or "very important" means of reducing turnover.
Regardless of whether firms provided CVT or not, 86% of the interviewed firm representatives look at CVT as a "rather important" or "very important" means of tying employees to the company.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com