Naturally, this has caused quite the uproar over not so much the intent of Section 702, but rather how this law could (or will) be interpreted.
We anticipate staff will use more problem solving questions than directives (e.g., what will happen if you... ? how could you... ?), rather than hard and fast rules (e.g., no running!), will set the play boundaries.
How could she leverage her role as First Lady rather than operate in the power-through mode that was depleting, rather than furthering, the cause?
I didn't think "why me, how could I be singled out?" but rather that crisis visits all lives.
How could a Uber-style app transport people in a way that grew rather than destroyed the social economy?
For example: How could the Corcoran's director have allowed her museum to respond to political rather than cultural imperatives?
but rather How has it reflected society?
Or, rather, how does it find them?
Or rather, how I make my living.
How could she?!? How could she?!?
