Sentence examples for rates for effects from inspiring English sources

Univariate deterministic sensitivity analyses were undertaken varying the following cost variables one by one, ie, administration costs, second-line treatment costs, discount rates for effects, and costs (see Table 1 for parameter values tested).

The most sensitive variables were the discount rate for effects and duration of treatment.

This resulted in €51,600 and €40,700 per QALY for the discount rate for costs, and €37,900 and €54,300 per QALY for the discount rate for effects, respectively.

Consistent with best practise and the Gates Reference Case [ 37], we also include the 3% discount rate for effects to show results of scenarios with equal discount rates.

For 2-way sensitivity analyses, the discount rate for costs was assumed to be 0% per year with a discount rate for effects of 5% per year, and, conversely, a discount rate for costs was assumed to be 5% per year with a discount rate for effects of 0% per year.

This difference is partly attributable to the effect of discounting, where we in our study use a 3% discount rate for effects, compared to the discount rate of 1.5% applied by van den Berg et al., but also attributable differences in the baseline population.

Convergence rates for fixed-effects were above 91.4% for all scenarios.

Convergence rates for random-effects, GEE, and Mantel-Haenszel were high across all scenarios (99.4% or higher for all methods).

Standard discount rates of 1.5%% for effects and 4%% for costs according to Dutch guidelines were used [21].

Table 2 shows that ICC had no effect on the non-coverage rates for the fixed effects or the random slope.

The discount rate for health effects ranged from 0 to 5%%.