Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The smallest detectable difference between raters was 5, and for the more and less experienced rater it was 4 and 6 TPs, respectively.
Similar(59)
Release the Raters It's a love-hate relationship.
In a region not known to coddle second-raters, it is not much fun to be the least distinctive sports franchise in town.
In summary, we have learned that for all raters it was not easy to identify system-generated questions from the set of mixed questions.
The number one competency ranked by these leaders as most important was "displays high integrity and honesty". In our global data set of more than 700,000 raters it was rated as the second most important competency.
With respect to topic 3, for both raters, it was relatively difficult to identify the authorship of the questions (F-score is between 0.40 and 0.44) and the agreement between the raters was fair (0.263).
While the previous analysis of correlations between scores from expert raters suggests that the scale was used in a consistent manner across different raters, it leaves unexamined the relationship between the 12 individual scale items (8 Image Generation and 4 Image Interpretation).
In terms of agreement between the raters, it was found that Cohen's Kappa yielded 0.91, p < 0.0001.
As the purpose for evaluation of injury data was not specified for the expert raters, it is not surprising that these core characteristics emerged as the most important.
In examining the patterns of coexposures attributed by our team of expert industrial hygiene raters, it was seen that stainless steel dusts, chromium VI, and nickel were very often attributed when there was arc welding.
Only one rater mentioned it as a scoring criterion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com