Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
@IGGYAZALEA There's an X rated tape of you, we bet you'd certainly don't want public, are we right?
Participants rated tape imageability (how much of the tape's description they could picture in their own mind) on a scale from 0 to 100%.
Similar(58)
They were involved in the whole study and blind to the pre- or post-training status of the interview recordings and never rated any tape that they previously corrected.
Based on a simple logistic growth model and the assumption of a constant expansion rate, Tape et al. [10] hypothesize that the ongoing shrub expansion in this region started roughly 125 years ago and should reach 100% of the region in another 125 years.
A second interviewer rated these tapes independently.
Two observers rated all tapes independently and interrater reliability was acceptable (mean ICC = 0.73).
Experts rated video tapes of interviews that were conducted before and after the program by students in both the control and intervention groups.
Their training included rating tapes and supervised co-ratings.
A standard rating scale (available upon request) was developed and utilized to rate the tapes.
Once the session was listened to and rated, ratings were discussed and feedback was provided by all group members to the lay therapist whose tape was being rated.
A pair of hybrid current leads (brass + stacked & soldered ReBCO tapes) rated for 12 kA in steady state and for up to 18 kA at pulsed over current conditions was designed, developed and tested at NRC Kurchatov Institute NRCNRC "KI").
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com