Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
The participants, it turned out, rated studies confirming their original beliefs as more methodologically rigorous — and those that went against them as shoddy.
The participants, it turned out, rated studies confirming their original beliefs as more methodologically rigorous and those that went against them as shoddy.
The 13 moderate and strongly rated studies still had some general weaknesses.
Toolkit descriptions and the contents of the eight moderate and strongly rated studies were brief.
Many of the low rated studies had a small sample size or limited evidence relevant to the review questions.
Publication status as a marker for the publication rated studies as published in peer-reviewed or non-peer-reviewed journals.
Similar(48)
DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers abstracted data and rated study quality and strength of evidence.
Two independent reviewers used prespecified criteria to screen titles and abstracts for full text review.Two different reviewers abstracted data and rated study quality and strength of evidence.
Two reviewers independently rated study quality by using predefined criteria, and the investigative team jointly graded the overall strength of evidence.
The practice teams rated study materials and instructions as easily understandable.
This capability is used for erosion rate studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com