Exact(4)
Reviewers rated images based on their own expert appreciation of each view and were not prepared or trained by the principal authors.
Viewers rated images that had been selected by participants in the Profile Image Dataset as being most and least likely to be used in each social network context.
In a placebo-controlled, double-blind between-subject design, 80 healthy men and women were administered orally the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine and/or the synthetic glucocorticoid hydrocortisone before they rated images of neutral and fearful faces with respect to the degree of fearfulness of the facial expression.
Participants who were made to feel more attractive (after viewing a series of photos featuring less attractive, same sex people) rated images of opposite sex, attractive targets more attractive, and especially so if they admitted they were dissatisfied in their current relationship.
Similar(56)
However, both readers rated image noise significantly better for T1-FSE compared to MAVRIC SL and MAVRIC-fast (p < 0.001).
In both patients, both readers rated image quality of the pulmonary arteries as being diagnostic.
Subsequent external review rated image quality as acceptable in < 40%% of the cases during 1980-1984, in 1985 in about 60%%, and in 1986-7 in < 85%%.
The subjects rated image vividness along a 100-mm measuring stick, anchored at the left by the phrase "no image at all", and at the right by the phrase "perfectly clear".
Both readers rated image quality of the pulmonary arteries in the one (i.e., the same) patient (2%) as being non-diagnostic (score 2) due to insufficient attenuation of segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries.
In a study to be published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences this month, researchers asked subjects to rate images of the president to determine which ones best represented his "true essence".
The display media employed may also have an effect on a viewer's capacity to rate images with image magnification, and ambient lighting acting as confounding factors.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com