Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The response rate of the scale was 99.2% (238/240).
It was considered satisfactory if the success rate of the scale was higher than 80%.
The feasibility of the WHOQOL-OLD was assessed by analysing the response rate of the scale and the percentage of the missing item response.
Item internal consistency was assessed and was considered to be satisfactory if the item achieved the minimum correlation of 0.4 with the domains it represented and if the success rate of the scale was higher than 80%.
‡If the item of "Whenever pressure builds up, management in the unit wants us to work faster, even if it means taking shortcuts that might negatively affect patient safety" was deleted, the Cronbach's α Coefficient, PPR and neutral percent rate of the scale of "workgroup leadership" would be 0.90, 6.04, and 9.48 respectively.
△If the item of "I have never witnessed a coworker do something that appeared to me to be unsafe patient care" was deleted, the Cronbach's α Coefficient, PPR and neutral percent rate of the scale of "outcome" would be 0.87, 36.44, 7.63 respectively.
Similar(53)
No influence of the cooling rate on the scale of the microstructure was observed.
And the intensity was rated on the scale of 1 100 mm.
Aside from anything musical you can say about Tyondai Braxton's new album, it rates on the scales of human achievement and imagination.
The single phase tests demonstrate that the energy dissipation rate of the larger scale mixer is comparable to the smaller scale mixer at flow rates ~8.5 times greater.
To obtain a final score, normative, reliability and validity ratings were combined to provide an overall rating of the scales as being either 'highly recommended' (two As), 'recommended' (As and/or Bs) or 'not recommended' (any Fs).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com