Exact(1)
In order to reduce overall morbidity and mortality of cancer, it would be important to increase the participation rate of screening program.
Similar(59)
The low incidence rate may reflect less diagnosis and lack of screening programs than disease occurrence.
Knowing the spatial distribution of these rates allowed researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of screening programs and determine locations of greatest concern.
In Brazil, the rate of cervical cancer remains high despite the availability of screening programs.
In unscreened populations alone, introduction of screening programs has demonstrated significant reductions in cervical cancer rates by 60%to90%0% within 3 years of screening instigation.
Improvement of screening programs and new treatment strategies against cervical cancer (CC) have increased survival rates of patients in the last decades.
The implementation of screening programs is the secondary prevention strategy instrumental in reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in the 20th century.
Attendance rates of cervical screening programs can be increased by offering HPV self-sampling to non-attendees.
Examples given are consent and respect of persons, stigma and participation rates, the cost-benefit analysis of a screening program, consequences of false-positive and false-negative test results, confidentiality and appropriate follow-up to positive screening results, as well as the use of screen results for criminal prosecution [ 30].
Compared with the current cytology-based call-recall programs, self-collected vaginal samples can increase access to cervical screening and may help to further reduce the incidence of cervical cancer by increasing the rate of participation in screening programs [ 2, 11].
However, individual and environmental circumstances that might independently contribute to the rate of participation in screening programs have not been thoroughly studied in Asian populations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com