Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The isolation rate of NTS was 4.5%.
Isolation rate of NTS was higher in the age group under 5 years (55.5%).
Similar(58)
Homer1a downregulation increased caspase 3 cleavage (NT versus RNAi-H1a: 6.71±0.78 versus 11.37±1.05-fold 11.37±1.05-fold d), the rate oFiguresosis (NT versus RNAi-H1a: 3b.2±2.26% versus 49.1±3.35% Figure 3e) and cytotoxicity (NT versus RNAi-H1a: 957.45±73.17 ng/l versus 1300.4±88.10 ng/l; Figure 3f) in neurons undergoing NMDA injury when compared withethe NT grate.
Furthermore, when compared with NT group, Homer1a overexpression inhibited caspase 3 cleavage (NT versus Flag-H1a: 6.71±0.78 versus 3.24±0.38-fold 3.24±0.38-foldd d), attenuated the rate oFiguresosis (NT versus Flag-H1a: 3b.2±2.26% versus 19.5±2.32% Figure 3e) and reduced cytotoxicity (LDH releattenuatedrsus Flag-H1a: 957.45±73.17 versus 635.20±62.10 ng/l; Figure 3f) in NMDA-injured neurons.
A total of 182 cases (7.0%, crude rate) of acute NT and 83 cases (3.5%, crude rate) of late NT were reported.
The developmental rate of 1lox-NT embryos was not much higher than that of WT-NT embryos (Supplementary Material, Table S1).
MERS-CoVs circulating in dromedaries on farm A during a 1-month period were genetically identical over the full 30,100-nt genome in 3 viruses and the spike protein of 4 more viruses, giving a mutation rate of 0 nt substitutions per site per day (95% credible interval 0 to 2.7 × 10−6).
The >1% demarcation arises from the average rate of VP1 nt divergence of ≈1% per year, suggestive of prolonged replication (6, 7 ).
We note that the slope of the plot of long-lived RNAP dwell times vs DNA length, (∼3.2 ± 0.6) × 10−3 s nt−1, gives an estimate of RNAP elongation rate of ∼300 nt s−1.
At the expected average RNAP elongation rate of 240 nt s−1, the F1 probe would have a brief ∼1 s window of opportunity to 'catch' the nascent transcript at the DNA molecule of origin.
Then, TiO2 NT films were annealed at 450 °C for 3 h, and the rate of anatase TiO2 NTs were obtained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com