Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Similar(58)
In contrast, South Asian Canadian-born populations had a higher estimated prevalence rate of fair-poor self-reported mental health status (4.39%; 95% CI 4.31-4.474.31-4.47%d to South Asian immigrant populations (3.44%; 95% CI 3.41-3.483.41-3.48%
Dan River's two ponds received a rating of "fair".
Eleven percent of animals in these groups received a rating of fair, and 5% (three animals) were rated as poor.
Investigators evaluated the quality of recovery as good to excellent in 91, 76 and 92% of animals in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with the remaining animals receiving a rating of fair.
Lower rates of Fair PharmaCare participation among eligible persons living in areas of significant Aboriginal population likely reflect important local cultural, socioeconomic, and policy contexts that deserve further study.
A 5-point scale of SRH was collapsed into two categories: a rating of "very good" or "good" health status was identified as "good health" and a rating of "fair", "poor", or "very poor" health status was regarded as "poor health".
Lastly, South Asian Canadian-born populations have a higher estimated prevalence rate of poor-fair self-perceived mental health status compared to their immigrant counterparts.
Lastly, South Asian Canadian-born populations had a higher estimated prevalence rate of poor-fair self-perceived mental health status (4.4%, 95% CI 4.3-4.54.3-4.5%red theireimmigrantant counterparts (3.4%, 95% CI 3.3-3.43.3-3.4%
Among adults aged 18 years old or above, the estimated overall rate of self-rated fair or poor (excellent, very good, good, fair and poor) health ranged from 10.1%% in Minnesota to 30.9 % in Puerto Rico [ 25], while 15.9 % adults rated their health as fair or poor in U.S. in 2009 [ 26]. 9.7 % Canadians reported fair or poor health in 2012 [ 27].
The Suzuki Forenza and the Sedona each earned a rating of 2 (fair).
For trials that evaluated efficacy, the abstractors also assessed study quality, generating a summary rating of good, fair, or poor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com