Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
I would rate it for readers aged 10+ on your own but 8-9 with your parents.
One major procedural difference was that Kensinger and Schacter (2005, 2006) used size judgements to unobtrusively elicit imagery, whereas in the present experiments participants were explicitly instructed to produce an image (or sentence), and then to rate it for pleasantness unpleasantness.
Similar(56)
For each female voice recorded, 15 men then rated it for attractiveness on a seven-point scale, both with a view to short and long term relationships, while each male voice was similarly rated by 15 women.
[When I rated it for the second time] I felt it [the Rubric] influenced me.
The reviewers then independently categorised each piece of text according to the domain(s) covered (there could be more than one), and rated it for content.
The teardown actually looked pretty simple, and they rate it 7/10 for repairability.
If progress continues at the same rate it has for the last decade, it will take 118 years to close the pay gap entirely.
Assume, too, that America grows at the 3 percent rate it has averaged for the last 15 years.
At this rate, it remains only for investors to lose faith.
At any rate, it's yours for three mil.
Google recently increased the minimum rate it will pay for bugs, from $1,000 to $5,000.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com