Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(34)
Silicon (Si) is a promising anode material for high-performance Li-ion batteries (LIBs), but it undergoes rapid capacity fading through severe volumetric expansion during Li insertion/extraction.
Although transition metal oxides materials have large theoretical specific capacities, all these materials including MnO2 anodes are generally plagued by rapid capacity fading.
Unfortunately, the commercial application of Si based anode materials has been greatly hindered, due to the large volume change of Si materials during their lithiation/delithiation process, which results in severe pulverization, loss of electrical contact and rapid capacity fading.
Silver with a high theoretical capacity for lithium storage is an attractive alloy based anode for Li-ion batteries, but large volume changes associated with AgLix alloy formation leads to electrode cracking, pulverization and rapid capacity fading.
However, it suffers from rapid capacity fading and poor cyclic stability.
However, it suffers from rapid capacity fading due to large volume expansion upon lithium insertion.
Similar(26)
The volume change of Si (310%) causes surface cracking and pulverization of the Si film and leads to a rapid capacity fade during initial cycles.
Electrochemical results indicate these electrodes exhibit near theoretical capacity for first few cycles; however delamination at the thin film current collector interface causes rapid capacity fade leading to poor cycling performance.
Progress toward a commercially viable silicon anode for lithium-ion batteries has been impeded by silicon's rapid capacity fade caused by large volumetric expansion and unstable solid-electrolyte interphases.
However these systems exhibit a rapid capacity fade, and as a result, poor cyclic performance.
Lithium-rich nickel manganese cobalt oxide, Li1.2Ni0.18Mn0.59Co0.03O2, prepared by spray-dry process, exhibits rapid capacity fade and poor rate capability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com