Sentence examples for rankings accuracy from inspiring English sources

This year, 46 sites participated in the rankings accuracy challenge that I run in conjunction with the Fantasy Sports Trade Association (F.S.T.A).

The FFLibrarian/FSTA 2011 fantasy football rankings accuracy results are as follows: Most Accurate Rankings Across All Positions: 1. TheFantasyShrink 2. 4FFToolbox3. FFToolbox 4. FootballGuys.com 5. DraftSharks 6. Pyromaniac.com 7. FantasyFootballGuidebook 8. BrunoBoys 9. FantasyFootballManiaxs 10.

This year, 61 sites participated in the rankings accuracy challenge that I run in conjunction with the Fantasy Sports Trade Association (F.S.T.A ., and the results of the contest were revealed on Tuesday night at the F.S.T.A. Winter Conference in Las Vegas.

We hypothesized that early ChemSpider entries (with low entry numbers) might be more relevant than high-entry numbers and tested if simple ID-number ranking (reported as ID-sorted) improved the overall ranking accuracy (Table 1).

We first consider the finite sample case, for which expected ranking accuracy can be estimated by means of the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and subsequently, we further generalize these results to the underlying distributions.

Results demonstrate that (1) classic AHP produces the similar trend as fuzzy AHP, (2) the proposed BAS procedure can ensure the ranking accuracy of AHP, and (3) the proposed approach can be successfully used by vegetable seedling propagators to support the design of a grafting operation.

Next, we assess the ranking accuracy in virtual screening using several performance metrics widely used in cheminformatics.

This fully automated procedure can be used to optimize docking protocols in order to improve the ranking accuracy in production virtual screening simulations.

Large-scale benchmarking calculations on the DUD-E dataset show that using the optimized box size also improves the ranking accuracy in virtual screening over the default protocol.

Figure 4 presents the results obtained for individual proteins in the D77 dataset with the green areas highlighting those targets for which the optimized box size yields a higher ranking accuracy than the default protocol.

To assess peak ranking accuracy, we calculated the rate of canonical motif occurrence for NRSF, GABP and FoxA1 within additive intervals of 50 peaks (top 50, top 100, top 150, etc; Figure 6 and Figures S1, S2).