Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The global risk score is scored using a five-point Likert scale, ranking risk from one (minimal and rare) to five (extreme and certain).
In an ideal scenario, after the deliberative method for ranking risk factors reveals which risk areas are most important to stakeholders and after menus of possible risk reduction initiatives are developed, risk analysts would estimate the effects of each initiative on each of the risk attributes in the risk summary sheets.
During meetings, they discussed the scientific approach of risk ranking, risk factors, indicators, and draft versions of the risk model (alignment efforts).
Similar(57)
Then, focus groups, each addressing one risk area, could prioritize the initiatives, based on their effects on the risk attributes as well as cost-effectiveness, using a process analogous to the deliberative method for ranking risks.
Building on the deliberative method for ranking risks, our approach overcomes one of the most important limitations (lack of a systematic process for combining quantitative risk analysis with stakeholder engagement) of previous environmental health strategic planning exercises around the world.
Where required qualitative information was converted to quantitative data using categorical ranking tables, and risk evaluation was carried out using ranked risk and uncertainty values.
We ranked risk factors based on PHI values.
According to Lim et al. [ 3], alcohol consumption moved from being the eighth highest ranked risk factor in 1990 to the fifth highest ranked risk factor in 2010.
We also ranked risk genes in the network according to these high confidence interactions.
At the same time, discharge disposition, which was the highest ranked risk factor in our model, has not typically been identified as a top risk factor previously.
A test that provides no more predictive ability than a coin toss will capture about 50% of cases in the top 50% of ranked risk scores.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com