Sentence examples for ranking p from inspiring English sources

After adjustment for previous exam results and sample characteristics, there was no association between classification of intercalated degrees and Year 5 exam results (p = 0.7049), overall foundation score (p = 0.0689), application form score (p = 0.3149) or academic quartile ranking (p = 0.488) (data not shown).

Each ranking is not equivalent ranking (p value of the test is 0.000), the critical differences (CD) based on Nemenyi post-hoc test is included in the figures.

The overall significance of the combined ranking (P = 0.003; Wilcoxon) was similar to that of the transcriptional network degree (P = 0.001), and was an improvement over the PPI network degree (P = 0.19).

The pressure fluctuations between inspiration and expiration at 25 l/min correlated well with the subjective ranking (P = 0.017), with differences most evident in the expiratory phase of the cycle (P = 0.04).

When the CRUFTS were sorted according to their RNAz SVM probability, known and predicted miRNA genes were enriched in the top 300 ranking (p = 8.4e-9, see Figure 4A, Table 1) and many structures with miRNA like hairpins can be observed.

In the case of the PANDA network, ranking the TFs using this combined score led to marked improvement in the enrichment in cancer genes, both among the top 5%% of the list (P = 0.02, Fisher's exact test) as well as throughout the entire ranking (P = 0.016, Wilcoxon test; P = 0.054, Kolmogorov-Smirnov) (Fig.  6b).

In this section, a method of ranking (p -norm GFNs with different left height and right height is p -normed.

Finally, a specific percentile of the ranked P-value is used as an FDR estimation.

For each centrality metric comparison, we used the highest ranking individual for that particular metric, e.g. to compare which rules are the best for generating high P-centrality, we used the highest ranking P-centrality individual from each network.

The promoter analysis of TP53 binding genes resulted in the top ranking E-score (~3.3) but not the top ranking P-score for TP53 (Additional file 1, Figure S1C) even though the TP53 binding motif was present in 71% of the promoters (Additional file 1, Figure S1D).

Cumulative incidence for TIA was higher for (-1072 AA versus GG genotype (log-rank: p < 0.001), and lower for (-444 CC versus AA genotype (log-rank: p = 0.03).