It would be expected that the adequacy of the legal framework to protect public welfare would play a role in the relative ranking of responsibilities.
There were no significant Gender X Business/Non-business interactions when Gender was included as a fixed factor in the MANOVA comparing business and non-business ratings of importance of the responsibilities or ranking of responsibilities.
There were no significant Nationality X Business/Non-business interactions when Nationality was included as a fixed factor in the MANOVA comparing business and non-business ratings of importance of the responsibilities or ranking of responsibilities.
In addition, to determine whether the perceived effectiveness of the legal system would affect the relative ranking of legal responsibilities, an additional question was posed asking 'to what extent are the social and environmental impacts of business covered by laws?'.
In terms of the relative ranking of the four types of responsibility, a MANOVA indicated that: female respondents rank philanthropic responsibilities significantly more highly than male respondents: F 1, 394) = 8.50, p < .001, η2 = .02.02
A MANOVA indicated that there were some significant differences in how the different nationalities ranked the four types of responsibility F (12, 1176) = 4.02, p < .001 (Table 5).
In terms of the relative ranking of the four types of responsibility, a MANOVA indicated that: non-business respondents rank philanthropic responsibilities significantly more highly than business respondents: F 1, 398) = 6.26, p = .01, η2 = .02.02
There is no significant Gender difference in the ranking of legal and economic responsibilities (Table 4 .. Controlling for Gender did not substantially affect the results.
These ranks require that the boy serve in a position of responsibility and perform community service.
It means paperwork, investigations, dishonor, admission of responsibility, a loss of reputation and possibly rank.
