Sentence examples for ranking of effectiveness from inspiring English sources

Since we are not able to pool the data and establish an evidence based ranking of effectiveness of drug treatments in GINA steps 3 and 4, we describe the main findings from the trials of the most frequently compared interventions (>2 trials/comparison), including over 100 patients per intervention group and having a follow up of at least 8 weeks.

The odds of a patient with tertiary education, having the highest ranking of effectiveness versus the remaining lower rankings was 1.52 times greater than for the uneducated, holding all other variables constant.

For patients who received care from regional hospitals, the odds that they choose the highest ranking of effectiveness versus any of the lower rankings was 0.57 times lower than patients who were treated at health centers, holding all other variables constant.

Specifically, the odds of a patient from teaching hospital choosing the highest ranking of effectiveness of treatment (7) versus any of the remaining lower rankings was 6.33 times greater than patients who received treatment in the health centers, holding all other variables constant.

Evidence-based ranking of effectiveness of drug treatments in GINA steps 3&4 is not possible yet.

Letting y* =  xβ +  ε where y* is the exact unobserved ranking of effectiveness of treatment; x is a vector of independent variables described above [ 18].

The choice of ordered logit was due to the nature of the dependent variable which was made up of integers from 1 to 7 representing patients' ranking of the effectiveness of treatment.

Indirect comparison of the efficacy endpoints, all similarly compared with placebo, led to the following decreasing rank order of effectiveness: infliximab, etanercept, efalizumab and alefacept.

However, it should be noted that the impact is similar for each age and gender strata and unlikely to change the age and gender specific ranking of the incremental cost and clinical effectiveness of MoM HRA compared to THA.

According to the hazard ratio, the rank of effectiveness of these prognostic factors was TGFβ > tumor size > MVD (Table 3).

Figure 3 also shows the estimated ranks of effectiveness for all strategies, with associated 95% credible intervals.