Sentence examples similar to ranking level of from inspiring English sources

Based on the characteristics of carbon content, percentage of noncombustible minerals, moisture, and calorific power, the varieties of coal are classified into four different types or ranking levels of coal, each with differences in energy output as a result of increased pressurization, heat, and time.

Attendance fell and London fashion week seemed to risk relegation from the premier league of fashion capitals (alongside Paris, Milan and New York) to the lower-ranking level of Berlin, Sydney and Los Angeles, a loss of status which would have had serious consequences for the health of the British fashion industry.

Therefore, top ranks are not reached by a slow improvement in skill, but instead young players come in with a given skill set, some remarkable, others less so, and rapidly reach the vicinity of their skill-determined ranking level, where they fluctuate for most of their career (Figure 4(B)).

We considered genes expressed in a given cell line when included in the top ranking expression level of 200, 300 or 400.

The philosopher comes in first, as the criterion for the ranking concerns the level of knowledge of truth about the Ideas or Forms of which the soul in question is capable.

Of note, this ranking corresponds to the level of precision grip (and thus manual dexterity) each subtest requires.

In this first round, participants were asked to consider what dimensions of a clinician's attitudes to depression are the most important to measure by ranking potential factors (by level of importance) derived from a review of DAQ studies and related scales, and to suggest any further dimensions or relevant underlying factors.

A generalized latent variable will be modeled using data from the client flow analysis and costing tools and validated by testing it against expert opinion (both researchers and service practitioners), to give each clinic a ranking score for its level of integration at various points in the study cycle.

Analysis of summary rankings indicates a high level of coherence between current and desired policies in all domains: coefficients of determination (R) vary from 0.46 for Health System Structure (with a high correlation coefficient; r = 0.68, P <0.01) to 0.86 for Sustainable Financing (r = 0.93, P <0.01) – current policies, overall, would cover adequate topics.

The CSP performance is slightly higher on average, although this difference is not significant: a Wilcoxon ranking test yields a significance level of p = 0.05.

Ordering the standard errors of the studies might be a tool for ranking studies according to the level of random error.