Ranking after discussion reveals some interesting results.
IGCC with CCS is ranked after discussion roughly on the same level as an IGCC plant without CCS, and even the pulverized coal plant with CCS ends up slightly better than its counterpart without CCS.
Post-discussion ranking just slightly differs compared to the pre-discussion ranking with only two ranking positions having changed: wind onshore ranks third displacing solar thermal on the fourth position, while nuclear and pulverized coal swap the last rank.
SocialGuide basically mines, filters, displays and ranks discussions happening on the most popular social networks about TV in real time, enabling users to discover new shows and interact with their friends, fellow fans and stars of their favorite shows.
Figure 1 Participants' mean technology ranking before/after group discussion in the USA and Germany.
Rankings across all genes in a study by BF and by P-value will in general be different, and for the reasons given in the Discussion, ranking by BF is preferable.
Based on comparisons of rank, the difference between the initial rank versus the final rank (before discussion and voting) was a rank deviation of 67% (6/9).
The difference between the initial rank and the final rank after discussion and voting gave a rank deviation of 78%.
The difference between the initial rank versus the final rank after discussion and voting was a rank deviation of 78% (7/9).
Although all participants contributed to determining the ranking, the discussion about condoms was dominated by a single male participant who doubted that condom promotion would assist with reductions in HIV.
The remaining uncertainties were ranked by patients, carers, relatives, organisation representatives and eye health professionals in 1-day workshops facilitated by the JLA, using Nominal Group Technique a mix of discussion and ranking.
