Sentence examples for ranking condition from inspiring English sources

Freund proved an analogous representation result for preferential logics that satisfy disjunctive rationality, replacing the ranking condition with a weaker condition of filtered models: a filtered model is one such that, for every formula, if two worlds non-minimally satisfy the formula, then there is a world less than both of them that also satisfies the formula (Freund 1993).

In this case, the scores were determined in the order of A, D, C, B. According to the ranking conditions, G-Types in the next generation were generated by the selection methods in genetic operations as shown in Table 4.

Since our previous studies indicated that the ligand and pharmacophore preferences contributed to improvements in the enrichment of VS [14], [16], we used the scoring values of both the empirical scoring function and pharmacophore-based scoring function as ranking conditions to identify inhibitor candidates of the DV E protein.

Ten conditions were also compared that featured in the top five ranking conditions across any age groups for the least and most deprived deciles.

Participants who received both rankings were significantly more honest than participants in the own compensation rankings condition.

As such, participants in the both rankings condition seemed to focus more on the firm profit metric than on the financially congruent own compensation metric.

We did not, however, find significant differences in honesty between the both rankings and firm profit rankings conditions.

In digital learning environments you also see batches, points and rankings to condition the environment.  .

In digital learning environments you also see batches, points and rankings to condition the environment.

The aim is to facilitate an explicit and empirically based debate on the relevance of expected lifetime health compared to other alternatives by showing how different criteria would lead to different rankings of conditions, and therefore, different priorities.

When we compare the rankings of conditions according to lifetime QALYs and proportional shortfall, we find that the proportional shortfall measure hardly discriminates between childhood deafness, adult deafness, and acute stroke, despite the fact that the number of healthy life years for these patient groups differs considerably: the lifetime QALYs were 38.5, 64.0, and 76.4, respectively.