Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (∆ costs/∆ effectiveness, relative to next ranked strategy).
Besides absolute cost-effectiveness values (mean and standard deviations, rounded to.0/.5), differences between strategies were calculated relative to the highest ranked strategy.
Strategies were found either dominated (more costly and less effective) or undominated (more costly, but more effective) than the highest ranked strategy.
Specifically, our findings showed that the top ranked strategy for both importance and feasibility was improving and maintaining the safety of rehabilitation professionals in the workplace.
In comparison with low dose inhaled corticosteroids, we identified combined maintenance and reliever treatment as the highest ranked strategy for preventing total exacerbations (composite of moderate or severe), and equally ranked with combined fixed dose treatment for preventing severe exacerbations.
Similar(54)
Nevertheless, there were still a few instances of statistically insignificant differences in competitiveness of lower ranked strategies at low damage accumulation rates (Additional file 5).
Although the highest ranked strategies focused on areas of Quality of Worklife and Work Environment, Financial Incentives and Marketing and Professional Development, key factors that need to be considered in the context of implementation include: workplace setting, geographical location and gender issues.
The top three ranked strategies were all patient-related: (1) "Motivate patients to adopt healthy lifestyles", (2) "Help patients seek preventative care", and (3) "Improve adherence to medication," with 75%, 72%, and 68% of participants selecting these factors as having the largest impact on diabetes care, respectively.
This approach requires heuristic selection of parameters and ranking strategies.
Here we assessed the performance of different peak normalization and ranking strategies.
G/W, Info and Sym are the relative ranks of the most significant variables (relative weight ≥ 0.001) using the GainRatioAttributeEval/Wrapper, InfoGainAtttributeEval, and SymmetricalUncertAttrbuteEval ranking strategies, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com