ranked by frequency from highest to lowest

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a list or dataset that is organized according to the frequency of occurrences, starting with the most frequent and ending with the least frequent. Example: "The survey results were ranked by frequency from highest to lowest, revealing the most popular choices among participants."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

aRegions ranked in order of priority based on confidence in predicted probabilities of large (L) or medium (M) between-farm association frequency (CI range ranked from highest to lowest), and small (S) between-farm association frequency (CI range ranked from lowest to highest).

BMC Veterinary Research

The analogs were rank ordered by K* from highest to lowest.

ACS Synthetic Biology

Table 2 > ranks the diagnostic performance of each of the five image features by linear discriminant analysis, listed in order from highest to lowest AUC.

Biomedical Optics Express

The important point is that ranking binding sites by their predicted energy from lowest to highest is equivalent to ranking them by their scores from highest to lowest.

Plosone

Immunodominant responses were the highest frequency responses (when rank ordered from highest to lowest) that comprised at least 50% of the total magnitude in a single patient or were detected among multiple individuals with the same HLA type.

EBioMedicine

Unigenes were ranked according to their RPKM (from highest to lowest) and the accumulated frequency of mapped reads calculated.

BMC Plant Biology

They were subsequently tabulated and ranked from highest to lowest for all items selected by 10 or more respondents.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The final evaluation performance scores of each method were calculated and ranked from highest to lowest.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

The values were ranked from highest to lowest.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Genes were ranked from highest to lowest expression levels.

Human Reproduction

The scores from each of the two assessment points were ranked from highest to lowest in terms of the percentage of overall importance assigned by the CBC utilities.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest", ensure that the data you are presenting has a clear and quantifiable frequency. This phrase is most effective when the frequency can be easily understood and compared.

Common error

Avoid using "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest" when the data does not actually represent a quantifiable frequency. This phrase implies a specific order based on measurable occurrences, and using it inaccurately can mislead the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest" functions as a descriptive modifier. It specifies how a set of items is ordered or arranged based on their frequency of occurrence. Although Ludwig doesn't provide explicit examples of this exact phrase, it confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest" is grammatically correct and serves to describe the organization of data based on occurrence rates. As indicated by Ludwig, the phrase is usable in written English although no examples exist. It is best employed when presenting quantifiable data in a clear and structured manner. While versatile, ensure the context involves measurable frequencies to avoid misinterpretation. Alternatives include "ordered by frequency" or "sorted by frequency", depending on the desired level of conciseness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ordered by frequency from highest to lowest

Changes the verb from "ranked" to "ordered", maintaining the same structure and meaning.

sorted by frequency in descending order

Replaces "ranked" with "sorted" and uses "descending order" for clarity and conciseness.

arranged by frequency from most to least common

Alters the wording to emphasize the concept of commonality instead of just frequency.

listed by frequency with the highest first

Focuses on the listing aspect, specifying that the highest frequency comes first.

prioritized by frequency from greatest to smallest

Uses "prioritized" to imply importance based on frequency, and "greatest to smallest" for order.

categorized by frequency with top values shown first

Highlights the categorization aspect, indicating that top frequency values are presented initially.

grouped by frequency in decreasing order

Emphasizes the grouping of items and presents them in decreasing frequency.

tabulated by frequency from maximum to minimum

Uses "tabulated" to suggest a structured presentation, from maximum to minimum.

organized by frequency with dominant instances leading

Focuses on organization and uses 'dominant instances' to represent higher frequency.

structured by frequency, most frequent to least frequent

Highlights the structuring aspect, explicitly stating the order from most to least frequent.

FAQs

What does it mean to say something is "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest"?

It means that items are organized in a list or dataset based on how often they occur, starting with the item that appears most frequently and ending with the item that appears least frequently.

How can I rephrase "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest"?

You can use alternatives like "ordered by frequency from highest to lowest", "sorted by frequency in descending order", or "arranged by frequency from most to least common".

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest"?

This phrase is appropriate when describing data where occurrences can be counted and compared. Common contexts include survey results, data analysis, and statistical reports.

Is there a more concise way to express "ranked by frequency from highest to lowest"?

Yes, you could use "sorted by frequency" or "ordered by frequency" if the direction (highest to lowest) is clear from the context.