Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
For more precise diagnosis, authors used these six statistical tools to rank the methods.
Nonetheless, it allowed us to rank the methods in term of efficiency.
Residents were given four choices (more blocks, simulator training, didactic lectures and better equipment) and asked to rank the methods by which they felt they would gain the most confidence with PNBs.
Although it was possible to simplistically rank the methods based on their relative performance characteristics (Table 2), this was considered an overly simplistic approach, and there was consensus that all the methods described performed very well and yielded valuable results.
As a single number to rank the methods, we calculate F max , which is the maximum F-measure over the entire range of decision thresholds (Radivojac et al., 2013).
Similar(55)
We reversed the scores when necessary so that rank 1 was the best for each method, averaged the rankings and ranked the methods by their average rank.
This ranks the methods by the magnitude of the error they make compared to other methods.
Compared to the rank method, the prime method achieves a higher provenance compression ratio.
The ranking of the methods at higher false positive fractions changes, but there is a tendency observable.
The ranking of the methods and the trend of both correlations were the same (Table 2).
The ranking of the methods changes with the scenario, with LA being always the worst in accuracy, as expected.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com