Sentence examples for rank papers from inspiring English sources

While a detailed analysis of this set will be reported elsewhere we would like to outline our approach for validating the ability of our models to rank papers.

The tool, which focuses only on computer science for now but will expand to neuroscience by the fall and then to other subjects, can rank papers, authors, and institutions by a specific influence score," Bohannon wrote.

The tool, which focuses only on computer science for now but will expand to neuroscience by the fall and then to other subjects, can rank papers, authors, and institutions by a specific influence score.

Google Scholar's distinguishing characteristic is its ability to show the papers that cite a given article, and rank papers by this citation count.

Kato's finite rank paper was submitted to J. Math.

I'd always assumed that Rosenblum's paper was a rapid reaction to Kato's finite rank paper which, in turn, motivated Kato's trace class paper.

However, there is no indication that Kato knew anything about Rosenblum's work until shortly before he wrote up his finite rank paper when he became aware of Rosenblum's abstract.

This finite rank paper has a note added in proof thanking Rosenblum for sending the technical report to Kato, quoting its main result and saying that Kato had found the full trace class results ("Details will be published elsewhere").

In this paper we describe briefly the tool's architecture and will focus mainly on step 6 (rank paper list in Figure 1), i.e., to order by relevance the papers returned by BioTextRetriever. Figure 1 Sequence of steps implemented by BioTextRetriever.

A Living Time Capsule Shows the Human Mark on Evolution (New York Times) How resurrecting 700-year-old critters in an American lake can reveal how humans changed the environment and how life evolved in response.Why you should ignore altmetrics (David Colquhoun) Altmetrics attempt to rank scientific papers by their popularity on social media.

Furthermore, the critical appraisal skills programme criteria 20 were used to rank the papers based on 10 questions that fulfilled the clarity, methods and results of the studies.