Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
From the obtained dependencies, the real part of the cubic NLO susceptibility was calculated for two peak laser intensity ranges: (i) 25 50 MW/cm2 and (ii) 190 240 MW/cm2.
One instrument designed for this purpose, known as WIBS-4, can measure individual particles and their number-size distributions in two pre-defined size ranges: (i) ∼0.3 12 μm and (ii) ∼3 31 μm (optical diameter, polystyrene latex equivalent) while also making measurements of fluorescence across two wavebands.
These control points define the relative time and angle of the rotations and are functions of the relative velocity on the following three ranges: i 0=vr<0.5 - from the rest position to reach a slow gait ii 0.5=vr<1.3 - walking at almost constant speed iii 1.3=vr<3 - walking fast. .
For NF, weight losses were observed in three different temperature ranges (i) 39 99 °C, accounting for the removal of physisorbed water, (ii) 100 312 °C due to the loss of acetyl groups by transforming to acetic acid molecules with subsequent in situ chain stripping from partially acetylated PVA [19].
The transmittance spectra of the PS samples were recorded in three ranges: (i) 400 7000 cm −1 Nicolet Nexus 470 spectrometer; (ii) 8000 12,000 cm −1 MDR-6 LOMO monochromator; (iii) 11,000 20,000 cm −1 Evolution 600 Thermo Scientific spectrometer.
The presence of objects at three typical size ranges, i.e., aggregates, primary particles, and subunits, was observed.
Similar(46)
Furthermore, the precision test was in the control range (i.e. repeatability ≤ |±7.5%|, reproducibility ≤ |±7.3%|).
This indicates that both factors converge in a similar range, i.e., a pathological range.
The power dynamic range (i.e., color bar range) is limited to 35 dB.
Within a reasonable range (i.e., (0.1< alpha < 1)) we observed only minor differences between topics.
Obviously, all three maps underestimated the AGB in the upper range (i.e., 100 120 t/ha).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com