Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Nonetheless, data from outdoor range testing on three independent buildings is presented.
Findings from this study challenge commonly held assumptions in acoustic telemetry research and suggest that traditional range testing methods are likely to considerably overestimate detection range of tagged animals in situ.
Real-world range testing will have to wait for a longer review, but driving California's highways and San Francisco's city streets was thoroughly enjoyable in the Bolt, making it an easy choice to recommend based on first impressions.
Because I do not have a proper test facility here at CG headquarters — or even a properly measured range testing system — I won't add formal statistics to this article.
Pre-tagging range testing of ultrasonic tags and tracking equipment showed: VR100 unit detected transmitter signal to 535 m (SD = 25.5 m, n = 5).
Range testing and a maximum recorded tagged Nautilus depth of 523 m showed that tagged individuals would be out of range at deeper than around 500 m.
Similar(43)
Means were separated using Duncan's Multiple Range test.
Differences among the groups were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan's multiple range tests.
Statistical differences among groups were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan's multiple range tests.
Duncan multiple range tests.
Duncan's multiple range test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com