'range of discrepancy' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe the difference between two figures, facts, opinions, etc. For example, "The range of discrepancy between the two surveys was significant."
A comparison of the mean and standard deviation (which is normally used as performance criteria) of the generated streamflow series and the historical streamflow series revealed that mean values of generated monthly flows (Table 3) for subbasins of reservoirs and barrage to be in close agreement with the corresponding historical values (range of discrepancy being 0.02 21 %).
In this study, the prevalence of Met S was assessed according to all existing definitions (JC, NCEP 2004, NCEP 2001, WHO, IDF, EGIR (Table 1) in order to establish the range of discrepancy between them.
For the purposes of this study, the prevalence of the MetS was analysed according to all existing definitions (NCEP 2004, NCEP 2001, WHO, IDF, EGIR; Table 1) in order to establish the range of discrepancy between them.
Our discrepancy rate of 26% is within the range of discrepancy rates (5%to32%2%) that have been reported for autopsies performed in the general adult ICU population [ 1- 22].
In a follow-up study to assess the range of discrepancy in self-reported sexual identity and sexual behavior in men and women of four racial/ethnic groups, Ross et al. [ 4] found that 43% of the African-American men in their sample who self-identified as heterosexuals were also having sex with other men.
For example, while the location of the sheep motor cortex has been known for many years, there have been few studies of the somatotopy of the motor cortex and there were a range of discrepancies across them.
We propose that the range of discrepancies in the importance of heterozygosity for survival and breeding success across HFC analyses may reflect differences in recent immigration and mixing between populations as well as variation in selection pressures [40].
The small range of discrepancies between the two performance goals and all the other variables (from.02 to.07) supports that premise.
The range of discrepancies, when compared with the consensus sizes obtained by a majority of laboratories for all markers, was 1 40 genotyping errors.
This systematic review found a wide range of significant discrepancy rates, from 0.4 to 22%, with minor discrepancies being much more common.
There is a lack of scientific evidence to guide the orthodontist on the range of skeletal discrepancy that is esthetically acceptable.
