Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
Due to the very large range and differences between the different health systems studied, it is difficult to draw a comparison with other studies; however, the figures presented here underline the importance of the issue.
Categorical variables were described as frequency (percent) and continuous variables as median (range) and differences assessed with appropriate non-parametric tests.
Overall, accuracy was low in the estimation range and differences between experimental conditions were less pronounced.
Visual scoring of CXCR4 immunostaining is presented as Median± Interquartilerange and differences between the two groups were assessed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, whereas digitized CXCR4 immunostaining are presented as Mean±S.E.M of arbitrary intensity scores and differerences are analyzed using t-tests.
Non-normal data were expressed as median (interquartile range) and differences between the two groups were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney test.
Results were reported as median and range, and differences between groups were assessed by Mann–Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis-ANOVA, or chi-square-test [ 14].
Similar(45)
The results were therefore reported by 5-year quartile ranges and differences were evaluated between 542 healthy subjects and 292 cirrhotic patients.
However, despite these diverging date ranges and differences in overall counts, the demographic makeup of the deceased in jail suicides were nearly identical between the two data sources, with an overall correlation of 0.99.
The length of hospital stay will be expressed as medians and interquartile ranges, and differences between groups will be analysed using a Mann-Whitney U test.
All plots in Fig. 8 show greater variation with larger interquartile ranges and differences between maxima and minima, implying more uncertainty in predicting prevalence than in predicting EIR.
The means, SDs, ranges and differences, comparing the preoperative and postoperative values in the three cohorts, using ANOVA for group comparisons and paired t-tests in each group are shown (Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com