Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(40)
Investigators were randomized by a centralized randomization procedure (What Health, Brussels, Belgium) to either a benchmarking group or a control group.
The 62 applicants included in the study were randomized by a true random-number service (http://www.random.org), with 32 participants being randomly allocated to the online group and 30 to the face-to-face treatment group.
Eligible patients were screened, enrolled and randomized by a computer-generated stratified, random assignments list (block randomization).
The two procedures were randomized by a computer-generated random number list.
In total, 300 participants (corresponding authors of RCT reports indexed in PubMed) were randomized by a web-based randomization procedure to interpret one abstract with a limitations section (n = 150) or without a limitations section (n = 150).
After completing the baseline survey, the 1267 enrollees were randomized by a computer-generated randomization program (Microsoft Excel®) to one of four strategies for receiving the 40 modules of the curriculum: Drip-Push, Drip-Pull, Bolus-Push and Bolus-Pull, described above.
Similar(20)
The patients are randomized by an independent randomization team that uses a computerized random number generator.
Participants were randomized by an online random allocation sequence generated by the EMMES Corporation and accessed by the study nurse coordinator.
After giving consent patients were randomized by an external statistician, using a random number generator with the allocation placed into sealed envelopes that were opened consecutively on the day of surgery.
Patients will be randomized by an independent statistician using a computerized, random-number generator through the block-randomization method of Statistics Analysis System version 9.2 for sequence generation.
Participants were randomized by an online allocation sequence generated by the EMMES Corporation (Rockville, MD).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com