Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
4 8 10–12 Unadjusted network meta-analyses were performed to establish the efficacy of the devices in the overall randomised populations, to determine the impact of excluding studies for which individual patient data were unavailable and to assess the appropriateness of fixed-effects and random-effects analyses.
Similar(59)
Efficacy analyses were conducted in the randomised population according to the arm to which patients were assigned at randomisation; response rate was assessed in the subset of these patients who had measurable disease at baseline.
Demographics of the randomised population are presented at Table 1.
We measured HIV-1 DNA in a highly characterised randomised population of individuals with PHI.
However, the response rate analysis was based on only three quarters of the randomised population.
In the randomised population, the incidence of SAEs was comparable between treatment arms (standard dose 31% vs dose escalation 28%).
The personal and clinical characteristics of the randomised population were well matched among the groups (table 1).
Baseline characteristics for the randomised population, which were similar in the vaccine and placebo groups, have been published previously.
A randomised, population-based study with a large sample size will be required to confirm our findings.
Eight patients (n=3, n=4 and n=1, respectively) from the randomised population did not receive any treatment and were excluded from the analysis populations.
Table 1 summarises the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in the randomised population as well as baseline glucose-lowering medication.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com