random agreement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "random agreement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an agreement that appears to be made without any specific reason or planning, often in a spontaneous or arbitrary manner. Example: "The two parties reached a random agreement during their casual conversation, without any prior negotiation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

So the state called in a company that turns technology against the cheats: it analyzes answer sheets by computer and flags those with so many of the same questions wrong or right that the chances of random agreement are astronomically small.

The New York Times

Inter-rater agreement was 90%, and Cohen's Kappa (which takes into account the rate of random agreement) was.80, which is in the acceptable to good range.

International Journal of STEM Education

Cohen's kappa ( k ) is calculated on the basis of the observed agreement p 0 between two raters and the random agreement p e expected for statistically independent decisions of both raters: ( k=frac{p_0-{p}_e}{1-{p}_e} ).

EJNMMI Research

The automatic annotation was also evaluated in relation to that by a human annotator, by calculating the Kappa coefficient (K) [37] as follows: begin{aligned} K=frac{P(A -P(E)}{1-P(E)} end{A -PnEd}where (P(A)) is pairwise agreement and (P(E)) is random agreement.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Specifically, imputation accuracy, a measure of the concordance rate between the imputed and observed genotypes for each SNP, dramatically over-estimates reliability when minor allele frequencies are low and does not address the inflation of false positive rates arising from imputation error due to random agreement.

Plosone

Nonetheless, it is a robust measure since it takes into account random agreement occurring by chance.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

To account for random agreements Cohen's kappa was also calculated.

BMC Cancer

Values of Kappa close to 0 correspond to random agreements whereas values close to 1 represent perfect agreement.

BioData Mining

Our goal was to obtain IAA for a reasonable amount of papers, while ensuring at least three annotators per paper, so as to minimize the chance of random agreements.

Bioinformatics

They emphasize the importance of requiring the agreement between more than two annotators, which reduces both the chance of random agreements as well as hard case bias, whereby a classifier tends to model the pattern of bias of a particular annotator for instances which are hard to predict.

Bioinformatics

By having different phases of corpus development, with a varied number of annotators for each phase and subset of the corpus as well as a large number of classification categories, we believe that we have minimized the chance of random agreements and hard case bias.

Bioinformatics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing statistical measures, especially in scientific writing, use "random agreement" to differentiate from genuine concordance and highlight potential biases or errors in data interpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "random agreement" when describing situations where agreement stems from manipulation or coercion; it's better suited for scenarios where chance plays a significant role.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "random agreement" typically functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a preposition or as a component within a larger statistical or analytical discussion. Ludwig AI highlights its use in contexts where chance occurrences influence observed agreements.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

14%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "random agreement" aptly describes instances where concordance arises purely by chance, particularly relevant in statistical and analytical contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and prevalent use in scientific and news media, indicating its importance in discussions concerning validity and reliability. Understanding the contexts for appropriate usage, as well as common misinterpretations, ensures clarity and precision in writing. Using terms like "chance agreement" or "coincidental agreement" can provide alternatives when appropriate, enriching one's vocabulary while maintaining accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

chance agreement

Focuses on the role of chance in the agreement.

agreement by chance

Specifies that the agreement happened purely by chance.

coincidental agreement

Highlights the coincidental nature of the agreement.

arbitrary agreement

Highlights the agreement's lack of a clear reason or system.

unintentional consensus

Emphasizes that the agreement was not planned or intended.

accidental accord

Implies the agreement was an accident or unintended.

unplanned consensus

Emphasizes that the consensus was not previously planned.

fortuitous concurrence

Highlights the lucky or fortunate aspect of the agreement.

inadvertent consensus

Stresses that the consensus was not consciously achieved.

haphazard agreement

Suggests the agreement was reached in a disorganized or unsystematic way.

FAQs

How is "random agreement" used in statistical analysis?

In statistics, "random agreement" refers to the level of agreement between raters or systems that could be expected purely by chance. It's crucial to account for this when assessing the reliability or validity of ratings, often using measures like Cohen's Kappa to adjust for it.

What are some alternatives to "random agreement"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "chance agreement", "coincidental agreement", or "agreement by chance" to convey a similar meaning.

How does "random agreement" affect inter-rater reliability?

"Random agreement" can inflate measures of inter-rater reliability if not properly accounted for. Statistical measures like Cohen's Kappa are used to adjust for the amount of agreement that would be expected by chance alone, providing a more accurate assessment of true agreement.

When is it appropriate to use the term "random agreement"?

It is appropriate to use "random agreement" when you want to emphasize that the observed agreement between two or more entities (e.g. raters, systems, or individuals) could have occurred purely by chance, without any systematic or meaningful relationship between their judgments or opinions.