In the 1978 landmark case of The Regents of the University of California v. Bakke [ 34], the U.S. Supreme Court determined the UC Davis quota-based system was unconstitutional in a strongly divided decision.
These changes included: (a) a shift from input controls to a quota based catch-share system; (b) an approximate four-fold increase in the level of observer coverage; and (c) introduction of a new class of trained observers.
In the past few years, most U.S. fisheries have instituted a catch share management system where fishermen are allotted individual quotas based on scientifically determined catch limits.
It said its choice of which match to show was "based solely on editorial merit and not a quota-based system that seeks to equalise the amount of airtime afford to men's and women's tennis".
Rather than having a system in which the EU members each hustle for the biggest quotas – which are already set far beyond what is sustainable – fisheries experts suggest individual governments should set quotas based on stock levels in their surrounding waters.
Quota sampling was used to ensure the demographic representation of the general population, with quotas based on age, sex, and residential district in Hong Kong (Rubin et al. 2009).
Proportional quota sampling was used to ensure that respondents were demographically representative of the general population, with quotas based on age, sex, work status, region, and social grade.
Proportional quota sampling was used to ensure that respondents were demographically representative of the general population with quotas based on age, sex, work status, region and social class.
