Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

quite described

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "quite described" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that something has been described in a satisfactory or thorough manner, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The process was quite described in the manual, but I still had questions."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Conversely, the isotherms were quite described with the Freundlich equation (qe = KFC e 1/n ; KF and n are constants).

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

But that does not quite describe the problem, either.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"The press don't quite describe it right," he added.

News & Media

The Guardian

I can't quite describe how that works.

News & Media

The New York Times

I cannot quite describe it, but for me the two — the struggle and Izzo — exist separately.

News & Media

The New Yorker

And for a moment a feeling that I can't quite describe pierces me".

News & Media

The New Yorker

The best alternatives – constructor, architect – do not quite describe what Solness did.

News & Media

The Guardian

"I don't think 'happiness' quite describes how I feel," said Froome afterwards.

I can't quite describe my joy when my calculations worked.

News & Media

The New York Times

Come to think of it, the word director does not quite describe her.

Sociology is too formal a word for his technique, and "documentary" does not quite describe it either.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "quite described" in formal writing. Opt for stronger and grammatically correct alternatives such as "well described" or "accurately described" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

The placement of "quite" before "described" is unconventional and can sound awkward. Instead of saying "quite described", use adverbs that directly modify the verb with better grammatical flow, such as "accurately described" or "thoroughly described".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "quite described" functions as an adverb-participle combination, where 'quite' is intended to modify 'described'. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, this construction is not grammatically standard and can be improved by using more precise adverbs or rephrasing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "quite described" appears in some contexts, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect and is best avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that more precise and conventional alternatives such as "well described", "accurately described", or "thoroughly described" offer greater clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase is rare, and its usage, although found across both news and scientific sources, does not establish it as standard English. Opting for stronger, grammatically sound alternatives will enhance the clarity and professionalism of your writing.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "quite described" to improve clarity?

To enhance clarity, replace "quite described" with phrases like "well described", "accurately described", or "thoroughly described", depending on the intended meaning.

Is "quite described" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "quite described" is not considered grammatically standard. It's better to use more conventional phrases like "well described" or "accurately described" for better grammatical correctness.

What is a more formal alternative to "quite described"?

A more formal alternative would be "accurately described" or "comprehensively detailed", which provide a stronger and clearer expression in formal contexts.

When is it acceptable to use "quite described"?

While not preferred, "quite described" might be acceptable in informal conversation where precise grammar is less critical. However, in formal writing or professional communication, it's advisable to use clearer alternatives like "well described".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: