quick succession

USAGE SUMMARY

'quick succession' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use the phrase to refer to a series of events that happen one after the other in a short period of time. Example: The team went on to win five matches in quick succession.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A success from the start, it issued enlarged editions in quick succession.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Three shots in quick succession.

The New York Times

A quick succession of management turnovers followed.

The New York Times

The papers appeared in quick succession.

The New Yorker

They read surprisingly well in quick succession.

The Economist

ate three of them in quick succession.

Cornell University

William's heart thudded twice in quick succession.

The New Yorker

She smokes two cigarettes in quick succession.

The Guardian - Film

Balloons began popping, three in quick succession.

The New York Times

At least, not in such quick succession.

The Guardian - Music

Then two arrived in quick succession.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "quick succession" to clearly convey that events occurred closely together in time, emphasizing the lack of significant delay between them.

Common error

Avoid using "quick succession" when the events, although related, are not closely spaced in time. The phrase suggests immediacy and rapid occurrence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "quick succession" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to indicate the manner in which events occur. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase describes a sequence of events happening rapidly one after the other.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

15%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "quick succession" is a versatile phrase used to describe events that occur rapidly and closely together. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical status is correct, and its frequency of use is very common, especially in news and media, academia and encyclopedias. It's important to note that the phrase is most effective when the events truly occur in close temporal proximity. For similar expressions, consider alternatives such as "rapid series" or "immediate sequence" to add variety to your writing. Whether discussing historical events or scientific findings, "quick succession" provides a clear and concise way to emphasize the speed and interconnectedness of events.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rapid series

Focuses on the sequence of events, emphasizing their fast pace.

immediate sequence

Highlights the lack of delay between events.

swift string

Emphasizes the speed and continuity of the actions.

prompt chain

Highlights the actions happening without delay.

speedy streak

Implies a continuous run of quick events.

successive bursts

Emphasizes the energy and intensity of events.

close series

Focuses on proximity in the order of events.

in short order

Refers to events happening quickly and efficiently.

one after another quickly

A more descriptive alternative emphasizing the rapid pace.

in rapid-fire order

Highlights the rapid and continuous nature of the actions.

FAQs

How can I use "quick succession" in a sentence?

You can use "quick succession" to describe events or actions that follow each other rapidly, for example, "The company launched three new products in quick succession".

What phrases are similar to "quick succession"?

Alternatives include "rapid series", "immediate sequence", or "swift string", each emphasizing the rapid and close sequence of events.

Is "quick succession" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, "quick succession" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Its clarity and widespread use make it appropriate for various writing styles.

What's the difference between "quick succession" and "immediate aftermath"?

"Quick succession" refers to multiple events occurring shortly after one another, whereas "immediate aftermath" refers to the period directly following a single significant event.