Additionally, the cited paper also extends both protocols to converge quicker to collision-free operation, to deliver higher performance in lossy channels, and to operate in a collision-free fashion in the presence of a large number of stations.
Consequently, ZeroCollision converges quicker to collision-free operation.
CSMA/E2CA converges quicker to collision-free operation and delivers higher performance than CSMA/ECA, specially in harsh wireless scenarios with high frame-error rates.
First, it guarantees quick converge to collision-free operation after any disrupting event, such as an interference burst.
The tag acquisition of the proposed CS-RFID scheme is 4.3 times quicker than the legacy CS approach that employed AMP and a single receive antenna, 3 times quicker than FSA with collision recovery, 26 times quicker than legacy FSA without collision recovery capability, and a reader with a single receive antenna.
4.3 times quicker than the legacy CS approach that employed AMP and a single receive antenna, 3 times quicker than FSA with collision recovery, 26 times quicker than legacy FSA without collision recovery capability, and a reader with a single receive antenna.
The stickiness of CSMA/E2CA allows for a quicker convergence to collision-free operation as can be observed in Figure 4.
ZeroCollision converges quicker to the collision-free operation and CSMA/ECA presents a behaviour that is more similar to current CSMA/CA.
Both systems provide quick direct access to individual collision events in a sequential data store of several terabytes, and they both considerably improve the event analysis efficiency.
The effect of Technique 1.4 (Tow in off-peak) in Scenario 1 (Collision), which includes quick clearance during the initial phases followed by final clearance in the off-peak, is shown in Fig. 9a.
