Sentence examples for questions were evaluated from inspiring English sources

SF36, KSS, WOMAC and VAS plus 2 satisfaction questions were evaluated.

The questions were evaluated by two domain experts who found that all the questions were satisfactory for assessment regardless of some errors in the questions' syntax (75% of the MCQs were assessed as syntactically correct) (Papasalouros et al. 2017).

All questions were evaluated on a five-point scale.

These questions were evaluated for test-retest reliability.

All submitted questions were evaluated independently and equally.

A total of 24 questions were evaluated by 169 participants in the Delphi panel round three.

"Is it a smooth voice, is it a rough, gravelly voice, is it a nasally voice?" Similar questions are evaluated for every instrument.

The quality of questions was evaluated in terms of four measures: fluency, ambiguity, pedagogy, and depth.

Using between-subjects experimental designs, the influence of evoked contexts relative to control condition for hedonic responses and sensory product characterization using check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions was evaluated.

The ability to formulate clinical questions was evaluated by one question.

The ability to formulate clinical questions was evaluated only by one question.