Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
The status of Jews and many other questions were considered.
As point of departure, two questions were considered: How others do it?
The Title III and Rule 41 questions were considered by both the District Court and the Court of Appeals and fully argued here.
The authors reported that 80%% of the automatically generated questions were considered as appropriate for novices learning English by experts.
The following questions were considered when analysing the assessments of both scenarios and plans: Which sustainability aspects are addressed?
Questions asking compositional relations of events, which were sometimes considered as behavior questions, were considered as structure questions here.
None of the questions were considered "required" so respondents could answer or skip whatever they wanted; we also included space for respondents to write-in further details especially when choosing the "other" option.
Failure to convert project results into standards, norms or regulations and the fact that the projects did not raise new unsolved research questions were considered to be the weaknesses of the FP5 and FP6 transport projects.
"Who Guards the Guards?" and "Frequently Asked Questions" were considered for the second series, but because there was not room for them, the producers bumped the episodes back to the third series.
Four specific questions were considered.
Four questions were considered: 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com