Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
In the case of single-item questions, subjects are asked a simple question about their chewing ability [ 12- 14].
In addition to extensive diet and lifestyle questions, subjects answered questions regarding their skin sensitivity to sun, tanning during summer, presence of nevi and presence of freckles.
For each of the 14 OHIP questions, subjects were asked how frequently they had experienced impact in the preceding 12 months and coded as 4 = very often, 3 = fairly often, 2 = occasionally, 1 = hardly ever and 0 = never.
Per instruction and per participant, notes were made of questions, answers to questions, subjects of discussion, positive and negative remarks and motivations that participants gave for their contributions, in order to map out the communication in the group.
For each of the 14 OHIP questions subjects were asked how frequently they had experienced impact in the preceding 12 months using a Likert-type response scale re-coded as a Guttman scale 4 = very often, 3 = fairly often, 2 = occasionally, 1 = hardly ever and 0 = never.
For each of the 14 OHIP questions subjects were asked how frequently they had experienced impact in the preceding 12 months using a 5-point scale coded 4 = very often, 3 = fairly often, 2 = occasionally, 1 = hardly ever and 0 = never.
Similar(52)
It will examine how environment, genes and other factors affect children's health, tackling questions subject to heated debate and misinformation.
Although there was no a priori list of meaningful questions subjected to philosophical work, one should be sceptical about so-called great metaphysical problems and their scientific status.
We do not exactly know if at that time the questioned subjects' headache diagnoses were identical to those recorded during the last year.
Moreover, we did not question subjects regarding intrinsic versus extrinsic variables that may have contributed to each fall.
For each question subjects chose one out of six answers ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com