Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
All questions of Sections 2 and 3 were in a multiple choice format with five to six options and only one correct answer.
Similar(59)
The last three questions of section two ask about problems that occurred when using cross-language links, again in the last project.
This behaviour explained the large number of visits that were recorded from section 4 to section 3. When learners encountered the first question of section 4 they had to track the content which contained the answer.
The authors say that they have mentioned these points in the revised manuscript in answering my third question of Section "Discussion", while I did not find where they have mentioned.
Replied 1 (Yes) to both A8d and A8e (Depression); Replied 1 (Yes) to both B14 and B15 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder); Replied 3, 4 or 5 to G2a or replied 5 to G7a Alcohol Dependencee); Replied 1 to H3 AND 3, 4 or 5 to H3a (Drug Dependence); Replied 1 or −1 to any question of section I (Obsessive Compulsive Behavior).
Controls were ruled out if they Replied 1 (Yes) to both A8d and A8e (Depression); Replied 1 (Yes) to both B14 and B15 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder); Replied 3, 4 or 5 to G2a or replied 5 to G7a Alcohol Dependencee); Replied 1 to H3 AND 3, 4 or 5 to H3a (Drug Dependence); Replied 1 or −1 to any question of section I (Obsessive Compulsive Behavior).
The guiding questions of this section are whether and how the concepts of resilience and vulnerability are applied in DRM strategies and policies.
The questions of this section were driven by the mathematical model [19] used to assess the biophysical characteristics of the product.
Despite the changes, the majority (ranging from 92.8% to 98.1%) of the respondents in Fiji had responded positively to the questions of this section of the RAD.
Overall, total score for the selected questions of the section "attitudes" accounted for 20.0% of the calculated maximum possible score.
Overall, total score for the selected questions of the section "practices" was 53.2% of the maximum possible score.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com