We organized the inventory questions into six groups (A F) based on the specific concepts they test (Table 1).
In the analyses about exercise habits, the answers from each of the three questions were merged into three groups with scores 1-2 represenever/irregularlyularly, score 3 representing one time per week and scores 4-5 representing >2 times per week.
The answers were recorded on a 5-point scale (coded from 0 to 4); the total deprivation score was calculated as the sum of the three questions, and categorised into three groups: low (0), medium (1 6), and high (7 12).
The answers were recorded on a 5-point scale (coded from 0 to 4); the total deprivation score was calculated as the sum of the three questions, and categorized into three groups: low (0), medium (1 6) and high (7 12).
Since the data were skewed, we classified each question into two groups and treated them as binary variable, that is, not susceptible to smoking and susceptible to smoking based on the median value (1).
In terms of governance (mainly major challenge 8), the numerous questions can be put into three groups.
To answer these serious questions, the participants were split into three groups and given the mandate to look at these questions through three different approaches.
The philosophical issues that relate to research on animal cognition can be categorized into three groups: questions about the assumptions on which the research is based; questions that arise about the methods used in the research programs; and questions that arise from within the specific research programs.
In order to answer the research questions, the sample was divided into three groups: cluster A+B PDs (n = 39), cluster C (n = 33), and Axis I-disorders (n = 19).
Due to the design of the questions, the responses were categorized into three groups based on the farmer categorization (renter or owner) and the land categorization (rented or owned).
