Exact(2)
In order to help teachers to free from the traditional artificial exam management method, and to improve the efficiency and the quality of teaching, this paper researched the analysis and design of the general test questions database management system.
Structured EBP education programs were provided which covered the concept of and need for EBP, and the skills required for EBP including asking answerable questions, database searching and critical appraisal.
Similar(58)
Table 15 Statement and branch coverage for Question Database Application Name % # # Covered/ % # # Covered/ Covered Statem.
Note that results with respect to the Question Database application will be later discussed in this section.
Similar results (in terms of higher coverage for OO implementation) are observed for group B. The numbers for the Question Database system have some peculiarities.
For Question Database (application #7 in Table 5), due to its size, we only tested non-functional concerns that are implemented with aspects in the AO version.
To design and perform the tests, initially we defined two groups of applications (namely, group A and group B), each one including OO and AO implementations of six programs plus two concerns10 of the Question Database system.
For the Question Database system, we focused the analysis on parts of the code affected by the crosscutting behaviour that, in the AO implementation, was encapsulated within one or more aspects.
However, as long as the quantification of join points increases (as in the case of the Question Database system), the existing test set produces higher coverage in OO code.
Differently from results for small applications, tests executed on Question Database resulted in higher statement and branch coverage in all OO implementations (see Table 15 and Figs. 8 and 9).
Results and analysis: Table 12 shows the results regarding statement and branch coverage for small applications of group A and group B. Visual representation can be found in Figs. 6 and 7. Similarly, Table 15 and Figs. 8 and 9 present results for the Question Database application, though separately from the other small applications.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com