Sentence examples for questions are evaluated from inspiring English sources

"Is it a smooth voice, is it a rough, gravelly voice, is it a nasally voice?" Similar questions are evaluated for every instrument.

The One Health (OH) approach to research ensures that human, animal, and environmental health questions are evaluated in an integrated and holistic manner to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the problem and potential solutions than would be possible with siloed approaches.

The 144 questions are evaluated on a 3-point frequency scale.

Questions are evaluated according to the 100-point Visual Analogue Scale format previously used in other questionnaires [ 16, 17].

Only the first two test questions are evaluated for the acceptability of the answer, with "that's right" (line 09) and "yeah" (line 17).

These questions are evaluated by the Primary Care Clinical Ethics Committee of the IDIAP Jordi Gol, which provides answers based on the current regulations on health coverage when moving from Catalonia to another EU country, to a non-EU country with bilateral agreement and to a non-EU country without bilateral agreement.

The quality of questions was evaluated in terms of four measures: fluency, ambiguity, pedagogy, and depth.

SF36, KSS, WOMAC and VAS plus 2 satisfaction questions were evaluated.

The questions were evaluated by two domain experts who found that all the questions were satisfactory for assessment regardless of some errors in the questions' syntax (75% of the MCQs were assessed as syntactically correct) (Papasalouros et al. 2017).

Using between-subjects experimental designs, the influence of evoked contexts relative to control condition for hedonic responses and sensory product characterization using check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions was evaluated.

These questions were evaluated for test-retest reliability.