Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
Differential Workload vs. Decision-Making Questionnaire Subjects scale.
Using the photophobia questionnaire, subjects with interictal photophobia obtained a mean score of 7.9 (standard deviation [S.D.] = 3.9), migraine subjects without interictal photophobia obtained a mean score of 0.9 (S.D. = 0.5) and control subjects had a mean score of 1.0 (S.D. = 0.7).
In a post-experiment questionnaire, subjects self-reported their familiarity with Bayes' rule and in a separate question were asked to make a Bayesian inference.
After completing the baseline questionnaire, subjects will receive proposed intervention according to their group assignment.
Finally, to assess the wording and structure of questionnaire, subjects were asked about the difficulty they had understanding the questions and completing the interview.
In this questionnaire, subjects were also asked how they feel after listening to the music (i.e. cheerful, sad, aggressive, harmonious, drowsy, activated, and excited).
Similar(40)
On the before and after questionnaires, subjects were asked to rate the candidates on the kind of 0-10 thermometer scale frequently used in polling, ranging from "very unfavorable" to "very favorable".
On questionnaires, subjects reported that mental imagery doesn't diminish how much they like a particular food.
In questionnaires, subjects requested that the style of surface expressions should be formalized between the original problem and the generated problems.
However, the fact that most of these indicators are based on answers to questionnaires subjects their results to at least two main concerns.
*Education levels based on the Vietnamese classification system Following the completion of the questionnaires, subjects received an oral examination.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com