Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Questionnaire missing for 8 participants.
Similar(59)
For carers who completed more than 50% of the questionnaire, missing data for individual questions ranged from 0% - 32.4%.
For patients who completed more than 50% of the questionnaire, missing data for individual questions ranged from 0%too 15.4%, the majority showing less than 10% missing data.
Two methods of imputing missing values, last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) and the median imputation, were applied for single items missing and for total questionnaire missing at T1 and T2 (those lost to the follow-ups).
Data on individual items of the baseline questionnaire were missing for four participants (0.4%).
In the 'No CRP' group, patient questionnaires were missing for 3 of the 60 participants (5%) and doctor's questionnaire was missing for 1 participant (1.7%).
In the 'CRP' group, patient questionnaires were missing for 3 of the 60 participants (5%) and there were no missing doctor's questionnaires.
Baseline questionnaires were missing for one woman in the frequency format group, and four women in the frequency format plus graphical display group; these women were excluded from the analyses, leaving 149 women in the analyses.
Interviewers and investigators double-checked all questionnaires in the field, so no questionnaire items were missing for more than 1% of respondents.
One or more questionnaire informations were missing for 546 women.
[ 16] † Data from original name list; ‡ Data from answers to the questionnaire; *Age is missing for 14 persons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com