Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The questionnaire may have the effect of keeping the jury effectively anonymous.
Thus, our questionnaire may have benefited from additional validation tests but we have deliberately eliminated validation against direct interview to avoid patient-to-doctor-bias.
Using the ACASI to complete a questionnaire may have made disclosure of risk behaviors easier and allowed for honest responses among participants in comparison to other survey methods such as self-administered, paper-based self-administered questionnaire or a FTF interview.
The SpREUK questionnaire may have important strengths.
The context in the questionnaire may have affected the statistics.
Some studies suggest that the timing of administering the questionnaire may have an influence on satisfaction.
As stated in the introduction, a culture questionnaire may have an effect on patient safety culture.
This observation suggests the CBPI questionnaire may have reasonable face validity [ 38].
The motivation to complete the questionnaire may have been larger in testers with positive test results.
Additionally, the extensive length of the questionnaire may have been cause for missing data.
Finally, the use of a questionnaire may have caused recall bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com